<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to get &#8220;Back to my Mac&#8221; without .mac. Or Leopard.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/</link>
	<description>Make Shit Break Shit belongs to Rob Robinson and is based in Chicago, IL. © 2002-2008</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clayj</title>
		<link>http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-3925</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-3925</guid>
		<description>Great steps! Wish I'd found these BEFORE I paid $100 for a year's subscription to .Mac...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great steps! Wish I&#8217;d found these BEFORE I paid $100 for a year&#8217;s subscription to .Mac&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2835</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2835</guid>
		<description>I came upon this post while looking for some info on "Back to your Mac." While the methods you're posting work fine, I think you're leaving yourself (and your readers) open to some major security risks. 

What you're doing by forwarding those ports is essentially leaving security in the hands of the protocols you're connecting to. For example, MacOS X client (as opposed to server) does not encrypt AFP (file sharing) connections, so anything you send via that method will be in the clear. Same goes for VNC to connect to your remote Mac's screen. Windows' Remote Desktop protocol will (if you tell it to) connect securely. You are also leaving those services open to any would-be hacker to try to guess your password or exploit weaknesses in the protocols you're making available.

A better (if slightly more difficult) method is to leave a single obscure port open and forwarding to your SSH port, port 22. (Your don't just forward port 22 through because it's a well known port to gain remote control of a computer -- so forward port 87644 or something else random to 22 and you'll avoid some common attacks.) Using SSH you can forward other ports and thereby gain file sharing, web browsing, screen sharing, and any other sort of access to your local network.

There's a few programs out there that make this easy for you, including JellyFiSSH, AlmostVPN, and VPN Tunnel Manager.

Your big advantage here is that you gain flexibility (you don't have to open a new port each time you want to open up a new service), and you gain security, since SSH is a well tested piece of security software and will provide sufficient security for most home users.

I hope this is helpful. Happy hacking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came upon this post while looking for some info on &#8220;Back to your Mac.&#8221; While the methods you&#8217;re posting work fine, I think you&#8217;re leaving yourself (and your readers) open to some major security risks. </p>
<p>What you&#8217;re doing by forwarding those ports is essentially leaving security in the hands of the protocols you&#8217;re connecting to. For example, MacOS X client (as opposed to server) does not encrypt AFP (file sharing) connections, so anything you send via that method will be in the clear. Same goes for VNC to connect to your remote Mac&#8217;s screen. Windows&#8217; Remote Desktop protocol will (if you tell it to) connect securely. You are also leaving those services open to any would-be hacker to try to guess your password or exploit weaknesses in the protocols you&#8217;re making available.</p>
<p>A better (if slightly more difficult) method is to leave a single obscure port open and forwarding to your SSH port, port 22. (Your don&#8217;t just forward port 22 through because it&#8217;s a well known port to gain remote control of a computer &#8212; so forward port 87644 or something else random to 22 and you&#8217;ll avoid some common attacks.) Using SSH you can forward other ports and thereby gain file sharing, web browsing, screen sharing, and any other sort of access to your local network.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a few programs out there that make this easy for you, including JellyFiSSH, AlmostVPN, and VPN Tunnel Manager.</p>
<p>Your big advantage here is that you gain flexibility (you don&#8217;t have to open a new port each time you want to open up a new service), and you gain security, since SSH is a well tested piece of security software and will provide sufficient security for most home users.</p>
<p>I hope this is helpful. Happy hacking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Page-Echols</title>
		<link>http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Page-Echols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>Hmm, totally didn't help like I was thinking.  Seems obvious now, as you can't get a domain name attached only to one port.

And the way I was trying is working now anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, totally didn&#8217;t help like I was thinking.  Seems obvious now, as you can&#8217;t get a domain name attached only to one port.</p>
<p>And the way I was trying is working now anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Page-Echols</title>
		<link>http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Page-Echols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>I have tried to do the same thing but end up getting an error message as my computer recognizes that it's the same ip address that I am trying to connect to differently.

Hmm, I'm guessing that the extra step of using dynamic domain names is what makes it work.  Instead of the same ip address with a port tacked on, it's a different domain name.  Off to try that now.

Thanks, Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried to do the same thing but end up getting an error message as my computer recognizes that it&#8217;s the same ip address that I am trying to connect to differently.</p>
<p>Hmm, I&#8217;m guessing that the extra step of using dynamic domain names is what makes it work.  Instead of the same ip address with a port tacked on, it&#8217;s a different domain name.  Off to try that now.</p>
<p>Thanks, Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moey</title>
		<link>http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Moey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 02:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makeshitbreakshit.com/2007/09/06/how-to-get-back-to-my-mac-without-mac-or-leopard/#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>wow! that's awesome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! that&#8217;s awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
